Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

2.1" supercharger pulley installed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2007, 07:10 PM
  #21  
Contributing Member
 
kevin444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have supercharger on ebay! look under ebay seller "lilshyboy" = )


hey how much was the spoiler and who makes it.
Old 01-16-2007, 07:22 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
99LimitedKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm broke. Just did a $700 stereo.

And JAOS makes the spoiler.
Old 03-28-2007, 10:47 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a related question.

I'm running the URD fuel upgrade kit with IPT VB upgrade and a trans cooler. What size pulley can I safely/effectively run with this setup? I'm not a drag racer but I like dropping the hammer now and then....
Old 03-28-2007, 10:54 AM
  #24  
Contributing Member
 
mastacox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SEAN_at_TLT
I have a related question.

I'm running the URD fuel upgrade kit with IPT VB upgrade and a trans cooler. What size pulley can I safely/effectively run with this setup? I'm not a drag racer but I like dropping the hammer now and then....
2.2" pulley is a safe bet if you don''t have an EGT gauge, maybe a 2.1 with an EGT gauge. Any higher will require water/methanol injection.
Old 03-28-2007, 11:01 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mastacox
2.2" pulley is a safe bet if you don''t have an EGT gauge, maybe a 2.1 with an EGT gauge. Any higher will require water/methanol injection.
sweet, thanks. What kind of flywheel HP can I expect with that?
Old 03-28-2007, 11:04 AM
  #26  
Contributing Member
 
mastacox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SEAN_at_TLT
sweet, thanks. What kind of flywheel HP can I expect with that?
Most people estimate about 320 at sea level with a proper tune.

Last edited by mastacox; 03-28-2007 at 11:05 AM.
Old 03-28-2007, 11:19 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mastacox
Most people estimate about 320 at sea level with a proper tune.
very nice.....very nice indeed! I'm sure I'll be chiming back in once I get to the tuning aspect.
Old 03-28-2007, 11:24 AM
  #28  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mastacox
Most people estimate about 320 at sea level with a proper tune.
Is that with the 2.2 pulley?

When I was talking to Brian @ URD he said 2.2 was the smallest you want to go without WI, with WI 2.1 was ok, and 2.0 would spin the SC past the rated max rpm.
Old 03-28-2007, 11:39 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Is that with the 2.2 pulley?

When I was talking to Brian @ URD he said 2.2 was the smallest you want to go without WI, with WI 2.1 was ok, and 2.0 would spin the SC past the rated max rpm.
yeah, with the 2.2".
Old 03-28-2007, 12:01 PM
  #30  
Contributing Member
 
mastacox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Is that with the 2.2 pulley?

When I was talking to Brian @ URD he said 2.2 was the smallest you want to go without WI, with WI 2.1 was ok, and 2.0 would spin the SC past the rated max rpm.
Yup, 320 crank hp with the 2.2" pulley.

I mentioned the possibility of running a 2.1" pulley as long as you have an EGT gauge, but you would need to keep a close eye on that gauge and back off on the throttle if you get close to catastrophe. It's obviously a better option to get WMI with the 2.1" pulley.

As for the 2.0" pulley, I wouldn't be interested in trying it. It pushes something like 15psi of boost I think and when boost gets that high I would be on the border of wanting to get an intercooler, meaning either turbo or centrifugal supercharger would have to replace the roots one.
Old 03-28-2007, 01:12 PM
  #31  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mastacox
I mentioned the possibility of running a 2.1" pulley as long as you have an EGT gauge, but you would need to keep a close eye on that gauge and back off on the throttle if you get close to catastrophe. It's obviously a better option to get WMI with the 2.1" pulley.
.
Since you brought it up At what temp would catastrophe happen anyway?
Old 03-28-2007, 02:36 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
midiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattleish, WA
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Since you brought it up At what temp would catastrophe happen anyway?
Lemme guess! 1550* is where I was running when things burned... I would think that 1600* would be pretty sudden bad news.
Old 03-28-2007, 03:00 PM
  #33  
Contributing Member
 
mastacox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Since you brought it up At what temp would catastrophe happen anyway?
Originally Posted by midiwall
Lemme guess! 1550* is where I was running when things burned... I would think that 1600* would be pretty sudden bad news.
Based on Gadget's testing, I think 1450* ought to be the high end.
Old 03-28-2007, 03:13 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
midiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattleish, WA
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by mastacox
Based on Gadget's testing, I think 1450* ought to be the high end.
I've always thought that 1450* was max power...

ref:
http://www.gadgetonline.com/Gauges.h...monitor:%C2%A0
EGT Gauge
In my dyno testing max power was between 1400-1450 F. Over 1450 the power would drop off indicating a loss of power from to lean of a mixture.
Old 03-28-2007, 03:18 PM
  #35  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by midiwall
Lemme guess! 1550* is where I was running when things burned... I would think that 1600* would be pretty sudden bad news.
Nothing like first-hand experience to use as a guide.
Old 03-28-2007, 05:53 PM
  #36  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
QSVeilside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
............................

Last edited by QSVeilside; 11-18-2007 at 01:20 AM.
Old 03-28-2007, 07:05 PM
  #37  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by QSVeilside
If I'm not mistaken, even the 2.1" pulley spins faster than TRD's recommended rpms on the sc.
I think you're right, but only near redline IIRC.

Last edited by mt_goat; 03-28-2007 at 07:09 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TJWilly
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
6
07-31-2015 02:05 PM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-29-2015 11:46 AM
yoterr
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
07-24-2015 04:29 AM
dinks07
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-15-2015 05:34 PM
mengquis
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
1
07-13-2015 10:39 AM



Quick Reply: 2.1" supercharger pulley installed



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM.