FJ Cruiser 2007 & on

C A I ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2007, 07:11 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C A I ?

Who has a C A I installed , what kinda of increase in fuel economy have you gotten , and any real benefit to getting it ?
Thanks , Bill
Old 11-25-2007, 07:29 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
OSU4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodway, TX
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't waste your money on a CAI, they aren't true cold air, the filter element is still in the engine bay. You also have a greater chance of water ingestion with a CAI
Old 11-25-2007, 02:38 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks , I have not heard anything either way .
Old 11-25-2007, 02:42 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Whitey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They don't increase MPG either.
Old 11-25-2007, 05:15 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Sparman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It sounds like it only manages to increase velocity.

Also, I'm not so sure I like the idea of the high flow filter.
Old 11-28-2007, 07:07 PM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
HOJU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UTAH
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like mine and there was a very noticable increased pickup, also it didn't effect my MPG at all.
Old 11-28-2007, 07:39 PM
  #7  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I have a CAI, or whatever you want to call it. It is second only to my exhaust system as the biggest waste of money I've ever put on my truck.

ZERO performance increase, ZERO MPG increase. Pile of crap.
Old 11-29-2007, 03:55 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your replies , very helpful forum .
Old 11-29-2007, 04:38 AM
  #9  
Co-Founder/Administrator
Staff
iTrader: (1)
 
Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 32,242
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Shadow Warrior has one on his FJ, and he will be incorporating it to work with his upcoming snorkel.

http://www.fjcruiserforums.com/forum...ns-w-pics.html

Here is his CAI

Old 11-29-2007, 04:49 AM
  #10  
Co-Founder/Administrator
Staff
iTrader: (1)
 
Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 32,242
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
PS,
I see Mike (Shadow) got his snorkel, and has a new install thread with it and the CAI.
http://www.fjcruiserforums.com/forum...tml#post709165
Old 11-29-2007, 08:19 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, thanks Corey . I'll have a look
Old 11-29-2007, 08:24 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
yotasavg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chico Republic, NOR*CAL
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corey
PS,
I see Mike (Shadow) got his snorkel, and has a new install thread with it and the CAI.
http://www.fjcruiserforums.com/forum...tml#post709165
that's my new favorite FJ
Old 11-29-2007, 10:46 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
ISurfer88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i also have the trd cold air intake and besides looking awesome it definately gives you more low end torque and a few horses. However, i have not noticed any major mpg increase. If it is worth it? thats up to you, for me it was because it souds great with my magnaflow muffler. One more thing, somone said something about it increasing possibility of sucking in water which is not true for the TRD CAI since it is a closed system that takes all of its air from the facotry location (unlike the AFE which has a port hole in the engine bay)
Old 11-29-2007, 02:31 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your info Isurfer , it is something I will be installing !
Old 12-02-2007, 10:10 AM
  #15  
Contributing Member
 
BT17R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Da Gorge, Oregon
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I posted a thread linking to TRD dyno data for the CAI on the 1GR-FE with stock exhaust. They show peak gains of 13 hp and 20 ft. lbs. beginning around 3K rpm.

I definitely feel the improved power on mine, and the sound above 3K makes for a more fun, sporting driver.

MPG change is tricky. At first I got a +1.5 mpg bump driving more aggressively than usual to during ECU training. Then oxygenated fuel season began Nov. 1 and it dropped back to +1.0 mpg. Since most report a 10% decrease economy with oxy-fuel, I think +2.0 mpg with the good stuff is a reasonable expectation.

Would I do it again? Absolutely. Well worth the cost and installation is a breeze. Have fun!

https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f135...esults-126120/
Old 12-02-2007, 03:09 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BT17R
I posted a thread linking to TRD dyno data for the CAI on the 1GR-FE with stock exhaust. They show peak gains of 13 hp and 20 ft. lbs. beginning around 3K rpm.

I definitely feel the improved power on mine, and the sound above 3K makes for a more fun, sporting driver.

MPG change is tricky. At first I got a +1.5 mpg bump driving more aggressively than usual to during ECU training. Then oxygenated fuel season began Nov. 1 and it dropped back to +1.0 mpg. Since most report a 10% decrease economy with oxy-fuel, I think +2.0 mpg with the good stuff is a reasonable expectation.

Would I do it again? Absolutely. Well worth the cost and installation is a breeze. Have fun!

https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f135...esults-126120/
Thanks for the info and the post , that is very helpful . I am glad that some feel it is of benefit to install this .
Old 12-02-2007, 03:15 PM
  #17  
Donny, you're out of your element
Staff
iTrader: (23)
 
DeathCougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 17,689
Received 54 Likes on 34 Posts
FWIW, Despite being made by TRD, the TRD cold air intake may void the warranty on your engine. Says so right on the TRD website, and anywhere else you can buy the TRD setup. So keep that in mind when making that purchsae.

Quote, from TRDparts4u.com: "Note: This part is sold with no warranty and installation of this part may adversely affect the warranty coverage of the vehicle."
Old 12-02-2007, 03:44 PM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
BT17R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Da Gorge, Oregon
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm, the way I read the link on the TRD site (click TRD CAI-->Overview-->TRD Offers Two Designs) is that the 1GR CAI is emissions and warranty legal. Could be wrong, but I think the racing systems have no warranty while the mild street system we're talking about here is warrantied. It would be worth a call to TRD to confirm, though.
Old 12-02-2007, 05:40 PM
  #19  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to see some independant tests on that intake since 13whp is a huge jump with just an intake on a naturally aspirated engine. Is the original airbox intake the size of a straw?
Old 12-03-2007, 04:28 AM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ramoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All good points , I as well would like more info on this .



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 PM.