Pre 84 Trucks 1st gen pickups

Ring gap orientation and the 83 FSM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2013, 06:56 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thetundrawolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ring gap orientation and the 83 FSM

I don't have my computer handy, or I'd show you what the picture of the diagram for the piston ring gaps.

It looks like some sort of strange religious symbol with a bunch of degrees thrown in to make it impossibly confusing.

I have an 82 2.4L 4 cyl, and I am going to be putting the motor together hopefully tomorrow. I *need* to know just what they mean by the diagram.

Please, can someone help me?
Old 02-14-2013, 08:32 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator
Staff
iTrader: (3)
 
kawazx636's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Are you talking about this picture:


Or maybe this picture:


If so it refers to the piston gap alignment. You want all of your ring gaps to be roughly 90* off set.
Old 02-14-2013, 09:40 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thetundrawolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do those apply to the 82 2.4 l pickup? No, the pic I am talking about is three or four x's drawn in a circle with degrees between some of the lines. it is insanely confusing. But those pictures are very simple and easy to understand.
Old 02-14-2013, 11:45 PM
  #4  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
wyoming9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: I live in New Tripoli Pa out in the woods
Posts: 13,381
Received 99 Likes on 86 Posts
Red face

The main thing is just don`t have the ring gaps close to each other .

Just think if all the ring gaps were lined up your rings would never seal leaving the engine unable to build compression.
Old 02-15-2013, 05:49 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
MudHippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Same general idea. Just 60°/120° offset from each other and 30° offset from center(top to bottom). Instead of 90°/90° offset from each other and 45° offset from center(top to bottom).

Name:  22Rpistonringpositions.jpg
Views: 1863
Size:  703.5 KB
Old 02-15-2013, 02:49 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thetundrawolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MudHippy
Same general idea. Just 60°/120° offset from each other and 30° offset from center(top to bottom). Instead of 90°/90° offset from each other and 45° offset from center(top to bottom).

Yes, that's the picture I was talking about.

Now that I look at it, the two twenty degree marks threw me off.

What are those spikes sticking out from the piston itself? Is that the ideal orientation?
Old 02-15-2013, 05:07 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
MudHippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by thetundrawolf
What are those spikes sticking out from the piston itself?
They are imaginary lines representing the gap widths of the 4 individual rings, and where they should be oriented in relation to the piston face.

Like those in the pic below(just much skinnier in the pic above).


Originally Posted by thetundrawolf
Is that the ideal orientation?
Yes. Though, for whatever reason, they decided that it wasn't ideal on later versions of the same engine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alexcarey
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
21
10-14-2015 06:05 PM
dzldust
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
7
10-06-2015 05:39 AM
hiluxinargentina
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-30-2015 05:51 PM
charlie_fong
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
0
09-27-2015 10:06 PM
Odin
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-26-2015 06:56 PM



Quick Reply: Ring gap orientation and the 83 FSM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:27 PM.